A Trek into Open Source on Windows ... PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ken Task   
Friday, 21 March 2008 05:16
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Was reading an article on Port25 (The Open Source Community at Microsoft) in which there was an announcement of MS choosing SpikeSource and a new stack called WISP (Windows, IIS, SQL, and PHP) [more on that later!].
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/02/27/dominic-sartorio-on-spikesource-and-open-source-interoperability.aspx

On the page referenced above, this clip ...
"... last December, the Open Solutions Alliance (www.opensolutionsalliance.org) published a report (pdf) summarizing the results of its customer outreach efforts. One of the key findings was that customers want better open source and Microsoft interoperability, and moreover, they felt this was the issue that the industry has collectively done the least to address."

Tried accessing the link that pointed to www.opensolutionsalliance.org and the PDF of the report and got nada.

So, investigating a little (cause I really wanted to see that PDF!) , switched to "troubleshooting mode", brought up the terminal on the MacOSX laptop I was using and began ... below are the test ...

ktaskg4pb-2:~ ktask$ nslookup www.opensolutionsalliance.org
Server:         192.168.1.50
Address:        192.168.1.50#53

Non-authoritative answer:
www.opensolutionsalliance.org   canonical name = alliance.darkhorseventures.com.
Name:   alliance.darkhorseventures.com
Address: 209.96.232.144

Well, DNS appears to be working.  Let's see if I can ping the site by IP:

ktaskg4pb-2:~ ktask$ ping -c 5 209.96.232.144
PING 209.96.232.144 (209.96.232.144): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.96.232.144: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=124.242 ms
64 bytes from 209.96.232.144: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=122.067 ms
64 bytes from 209.96.232.144: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=133.598 ms
64 bytes from 209.96.232.144: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=111.622 ms
^C
--- 209.96.232.144 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 111.622/122.882/133.598/7.812 ms

Yep, so at least the NIC is responding.  How about a quick scan for port 80 ... thinking maybe the web site is just down for upgrading/etc. ...

ktaskg4pb-2:~ ktask$ nmap -p 80 209.96.232.144

Starting Nmap 4.52 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2008-03-21 09:33 CDT
Interesting ports on icebits.com (209.96.232.144):
PORT   STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open  http

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 4.915 seconds

Interesting ... I see "icebits.com".

Ok - let's follow that: http://www.icebits.com
and I get a nice login screen for Centric CRM (customer relations management?!!)

Too bad ... wanted to the "research" behind and about WISP some more.
Tried Googling for WISP ... got hits for a resort, a knitting mag., a radio station, scented oil fragrancer, a reference to Wikipedia that defines the acronym as "Wireless Internet Service Provider".  Even though Google is the most often used search engine on Internet today, WISP (the stack) doesn't seem to show on the radar!

A quick comment about WISP ... the only thing open in WISP is PHP.
Compare LAMP (the "P" stands for PHP, Python, and Perl BTW) to WISP and one can see there is greater flexibility in scripting languages for the stacks on the LAMP side.

Still, attempting browser to a variety of options ... IP, CNAME, etc.
results are the same ... nada.

Finally do a NetCraft lookup for www.opensolutionsalliance.org
and look what they are running:

Visionary Systems 715 Middle Ground Blvd. Norfolk VA US 23666    209.96.232.144    Linux    Apache-Coyote/1.1    30-Jan-2008

and one for SpikeSource itself:

SpikeSource 1400 Seaport Drive Building 9 3rd Floor REDWOOD CITY CA US 94063    209.10.209.34    Linux    Apache    10-Dec-2007

No info on Netcraft about www.icebits.com
but ... sending a 404 one sees:
Apache Tomcat/5.5.15

Hmmmmm ... those 2 "players" choose Apache on Linux for their web services.
What does that tell you?


Quite a change over a relatively short time period ... from ignoring to eradication (MS Tax) to attack (FUD) to partnering ...
http://www.microsoft.com/opensource/economic.mspx

All in all - I'd say that open source is "winning" ... if one is into "keeping score"!


 
Joomla template by a4joomla